Anything I might write in response to Open AI’s release of its ChatGPT chatbot for public beta testing is likely to come across as something that a large language model would itself generate. The matrix of positions, the arguments and specific phrases, have certainly appeared frequently enough in the training material to be reproduced with as many novel tweaks and wrinkles as you could want: A critique of AI, but in the style of a Henry Fielding novel. A critique of AI as a Pinter play.
"In practice, people level down their expectations and demands to what machines can handle, learning to accept that as the most that one can expect from the world"
I fell in love with this statement. You have depicted the perfect deception; like a sleight of hand. We think the machine is so sophisticated when in fact, we become less sophisticated so that we can become one with the machine.
"In practice, people level down their expectations and demands to what machines can handle, learning to accept that as the most that one can expect from the world"
I fell in love with this statement. You have depicted the perfect deception; like a sleight of hand. We think the machine is so sophisticated when in fact, we become less sophisticated so that we can become one with the machine.